What Uzbek girls look like. The most beautiful Uzbek woman. Uzbek girls. The most beautiful model

Uzbek 08/29/2012 18:37

Quoting ssass:

of course, it is understandable why you want to write everyone down as mestizos, and the Soviet formulation of the question and the answer to it is very suitable for this. But we must respect the nations living in Central Asia and in Kazakhstan. This is not a herd of animals that were suddenly taken and made as a people by orders from above. These peoples have their own culture, different from each other. And people are not such idiots to be called and named. That the Tajiks suddenly started talking in Farsi because they were called that. The peoples who lived on these lands cannot, with a wave of a wand, change their customs and language. The Uzbek Khanate was formed in 1428 by Khan Abulkhairkhan in the north of modern Kazakhstan. Part of the population, headed by Berke Sultan, dissatisfied with the rule of the khan, migrated to Lake Balkhash and created the Kazakh Khanate. And they began to be called at first the Uzbek Kazakhs. Then simply - Kazakhs. At that time there was no trace of an attack by the Oirats - Kalmyks. The word Kazakh (Cossack) means separated, fallen away, left without a kind of tribe., Excuse me, but I have to write - in one word - a renegade. read "Notes of Travelers to Central Asia". "The genealogical tree of the Turks" - Abulgazikhan, "Baburname" - Babur. Also - Russian Cossacks. These are people who fled from their masters. For example, when Yalangtosh is the khakim of Samarkand, a ragged child appeared in the city, he was called a Kazakh, although he was from the Kalmyks (Arminiy Vamberi). And the definition of a people on a religious basis is just nonsense! Why then did the nations fight each other with each other despite their religious unity? The Uzbeks who seized Turkestan in the 16th century adopted the customs and culture of the local Turks (Turks) and also began to be called Turks. Until 1924, the people were called that way, and later, during the 1926 census, 87% of the population of Uzbekistan were called Turks. Relations between Uzbeks and Turkmens, Uzbeks and Kazakhs were very bad and there were clashes and wars all the time. Modern Uzbeks have 92 tribes, but not all of them belong to the Uzbek ulus. For example, the tribes - Turk, Barlas, Kaltatoy, Turkman, etc., are not included in the tribes of the Uzbek ulus.

i have already read some of your texts and the opinion suggests itself that you are a reading, but under-read person. still wondering who you are by nationality and by profession or interests. At the expense of nationalities and nations, everything is conditional. in my opinion in anthropology, it is said: that in order to establish more or less physical, mental, cultural and value uniformity among the same area of \u200b\u200bpeople isolated by culture, dynasty, borders of neighboring countries or natural barriers, 50 generations must be replaced (one generation is taken 25 years) or about 1250 years. There are peoples and entire regions with very ancient history and there one can trace more or less homology of representatives in all of the above parameters (Caucasians, Middle Easterners, etc.). For example, Russian politicians and intellectuals are trying to use every opportunity to lengthen the period of their statehood. The same is with Kazakhs and Uzbeks. Kazakhs have a saying like: Uzbek is your brother, and Sart is our enemy. You give the correct meaning of the word Cossack, but there was no ethnonym Kazakh in history, it was established in the 20th century as a variant of Cossack in dialectal form. But some of the current Kazakh intellectuals, in an attempt to make their statehood older, openly exaggerate with events and facts. They almost assert that the "ethnonym Kazakh" (precisely in the form Kazakh) is older than the very first Kazakh Khanate (early 15th century). The funniest interpretation of etymology is from Kasogs, Khazars, Kaz ak (white goose), from the name. Kaspi + Sak Kassak tribes. The same is true for modern official Uzbek historians, the desire to smoothly transfer all the ancient peoples inhabiting the territory of the present Uzbek into the ancestors of modern Uzbeks, this is correct, but the reverse logic (arising even in a child) is already wrong, so Ibn Sina was an Uzbek :). In general, always in the medieval history of Central Asia, it is necessary to take into account the moment of the invasion of Chingiz in conjunction with the customs of all the tribes that made up his army, in historical moments before the rise of the Mongols, all the factors in the emergence of such a large association of tribes and the status of each tribe. Genghis divided many tribes between the koshuns, the koshuns with the entire army-people, the name of the koshun commander. And when it is motley in tribal and ethnic composition, but more or less homogeneous in terms of race, the army invades territories and regions inhabited by a different racial type with simultaneously possessing various ethnic characteristics (according to the "country" of residence), with its own cultures and mentality. Further, under the influence of various factors, both contributing to and preventing cross-breeding, a complex process of folding and disintegration occurs at different points in time. state entities taking into account their inhabitants (who prevails: representatives of the culture of nomads or sedentary). It is not so important that you specify that de of the 92 Uzbek tribes are not all Uzbek, and some remain from the Chagatai ulus, but you can take an earlier dating of the moment of the Mongol invasion, the moment of the resettlement of the Turkic tribes of the early period. It is important that at the time of the entry of a tribe, or part of a tribe, its previous name is obscured by the name of the ulus, ale, the horde of the khanate. They become ale. For example, in the Khiva Khanate, they say that the Kungrads from the Uzbek ulus ruled, but every inhabitant was not called an Uzbek. The people themselves were divided into rayat (peasantry and artisans), local to nomadic nobility, clergy (who had some kind of genetic material from the ancient Khorezmians, Parsis, Parthians, Oghuz, etc.) and nomads (aristocrats and ordinary horsemen). Even now, among modern Khorezmians, there are dialects with a predominance of both Oghuz and Kipchak articulations. But they are all Sunni Muslims, you must agree in those days a rather strong factor in promoting the coexistence of ethnic groups in one state .. If you follow the example of one of the last sovereign Central Asian state (you can take bukh. -t, kokand. khan-vo)), then modern Kazakhstan should be called Astana or the Republic of Astana, and the people are Nazarbeks. :) And the fact that the Kazakh Khanate Berke formed., You can cite sources. As far as I know, these people were Zhanibek Sultan and Kerey. And the brutal defeat in the battle with the Oirats of Abulkhair Khan in the 20s of the 15th century, of course, weakened his position among his competitors for power, which was facilitated by the economic weakening of his people after the defeat. Let's return to the rayat and Sarts, in contrast to the Tajiks who had their main language (Farsi), the Sarts spoke Turkic dialects, but did almost the same thing as the Tajiks, and the mentality, way of life, appearance and culture were mostly similar. This made them very different from the nomads. Of course, they can be derived from the Sogdians, Khorezmians, Parkans, Chachs, Greco-Macedonians, Kushan Sakas, Hephtalites, Huns, into the early Turks, Arabs, etc. But the fact is that now they are mostly Uzbeks or Tajiks or Uighurs, someone is Kazakh or Turkmen of an unnatural appearance for them. :) Again, they can be called Islambeks, Imambeks, Nazarbeks :). And Uzbekistan is Tashkent. I know that my ancestors were Arabs, but not only them. Outwardly, we can say that my relatives and I have both Turkic and Tajik (maybe Sogdian, etc.) ). According to my passport, I am Uzbek. The most indigenous inhabitant of this region (Tashkent). But when we meet a stranger, they think that I am Khorezm or Azerbaijani and sometimes Tajik. :)

Uzbek 14.09.2012 21:59

Quoting ssass:

Honestly, I can't understand what you want from me, what is my nationality? But this is a convention, as you say, then why?
I am Uzbek, and not only according to my passport, like some. True, there is such a problem with some Uzbeks, who are not Uzbeks (maybe) - there is no sense of self-awareness. This is not found in any nation. Your cosmopolitanism will not be accepted by a Kazakh, or ... or anyone else. Why impose your illness on others. Someone is Uzbek, Kazakh or Tajik, and someone is a mestizo, "well ... nothing happens, it happens." What the Kazakhs come up with about themselves, I know without you. Where I agree with you is that the name Kazakh was finally assigned to them in the 20-30s of the 20c. One should read about Uzbeks not only in Soviet textbooks or the like. A "well-read" comrade should know that the history of the Uzbek people begins long before Genghis Khan. And if there had not been an invasion of Genghis Khan, nothing would have changed the history of the people, only a touch has been added. I don’t want to repeat the same thing several times and don’t want to give an example from the words of Christ "do not throw beads in front of ...". I do not want to be like others. But if you are interested, read "my opinion" about Uzbeks (Turk) and links to primary sources in both "the most ... Uzbeks" and "... Uzbeks." Uzbeks need to "lengthen" their history. Genetically, some of the Uzbeks and Uighurs are direct descendants of the people who settled this territory 40 thousand years ago, and, unlike others, have never moved from here. 90% of the peoples of Eurasia are descendants of those first people, but they all once moved to other places, unlike the ancestors of the Uzbeks and Uighurs. Ibn Sino is not known by his father, but Sogdian by his mother. And what difference does that make? Beruniy was definitely not an Uzbek (Turk), but he called the local population Turks (Turk). Farabi who lived before Ibn Sina was from the Turk tribe. And Ibn Sino considered him the second teacher. Far from all Sogdians became Tajiks. Rather, they did not. You need to know the relationship between the Iranians and the Sogdians. Tajiks (before the revolution Tezik, and in the past Tazy) from the 11th century to the beginning of the 20th century were called Iranians, Uzbeks, Armenians ... other peoples north of Iran. For example "Tezikovka" otherwise tezik bazaar was translated as Tajik bazaar, not otherwise. It was mainly Iranians who traded there. And Tajiks are not indigenous to Turkestan. Read about the inhabitants of Khorezm during the time of the Uzbek khans and how they were called from Abulgazi Khan. Maybe Janibek and Kerey created Kaz. Khanate, I read about it for a long time and I don't remember, but among the many who were the first to oppose Abulkhairkhan was Berke.
- "If you follow the example of one of the last sovereign Central Asian state (you can take Bukh. Em-t, kokand. Khan-vo)), then modern Kazakhstan should be called Astana or the Republic of Astana, and the people Nazarbeks.": "Again, they can be called to call islambeks, imambeks, nazarbeks :). And Uzbekistan is Tashkent. "
- What are you talking about? "you think what you say - and Borjomi?"
Speaking about the common ancestors of the Uighurs, Turkmens and Tajiks, I would like to recall the last question again. In your opinion, if the religion is one, then the people are one. But it’s not like that. Azerbaijanis and Iranians are Shiites, and even live in the same country (Iran), Greeks, Russians, Bulgarians, part of Ukrainians, Serbs and others are Orthodox, but the people are different. Together with the Kazakhs and the Turkmens, we have absolutely different culture and we can never be one people with them. Most Kazakhs are Muslims so formally because their khans converted to Islam. Many of them are not even circumcised. You can not cross a bulldog with a rhino. We have the same culture and customs with the Uyghurs, and the Tajiks who have lived among us for a thousand years, or for 500 years, adopted our culture and forgot their Iranian, but at the same time did not forget either the language or their roots (intelligentsia). In Tajikistan, even the Iranian flag (in 99%) At first, the truth was TASSR, then TSSR. ...

Dear opponent, I congratulate you and all Wed. Asians Happy Independence Holidays.
To be honest, this rating, this one, leaves ambiguous feelings. His mission does not correspond to the announced one. It seems that the site itself is something different ..., but the question arises, is it not for provocation. On the site of this section, visitors only do what they indulge in emotions, and why?, But the discussion went on a delicate topic-nat. question (as in that joke, when one of the representatives of nationalities, finding no reason to praise his people, said - well, I'm hanging here for you ...). For me, as a citizen of Uzbekistan, not to say that it is quite pleasant. I would like to tell everyone, be more restrained in expressions and do not get carried away by emotions, because all this exaltation generates rudeness, and resentments are only thrown on opposite sides of the barricades.
Both patriots and cosmopolitans are close to me, of course, within reason. It would be very interesting to find out from the Admin what country he is a citizen of, what are his vital interests, so to speak credo, what goals he set when creating this site. This one is just to form an opinion about the respected Admin.
I turn to you, dear ssass. I respect you, because you, like friends here, are interested in the history of your ancestors (like khouseksi, marat78, etc.), although your prejudice in defending your visions jarring, otherwise I can not call it, because caustic remarks, the dispute cannot be resolved, it is necessary to convince. In Logic, there are rules of syllogism, but there is also sophism, aporias and an appeal not to facts, but to a person (in order to confuse the opponent). I can be subjective, but I also know that I am fairly objective. So, trying to glue something that does not exist to my personality is incorrect. Let me explain - I am a patriot of my homeland (in early childhood it was a room, a house, then a street, a makhalla, then at school it was purposefully introduced into the consciousness that the main concept of the homeland is the USSR, and I am, first of all, a citizen of this country (I was honest October and pioneer, but deliberately refused the Komsomol.) In the family, I saw something different, first of all, a double game, for work and school we are officially the USSR and communist atheists, but we note that forbidden Navruz, Khaits, thin, older aunts on the father's side they know from the grandmother the legends about the life of the prophets (Yusuf for example) in the Uzbek language in poetic and song form (not the legends about Alpamysh), to teach etiquette (which, as it turned out later, was Muslim), some Sharia norms and basic suras and kalim. the latest history (of course, gradually, in accordance with my perception) of Tashkent, our ancestors, starting with grandfather, his brothers, dadys and further into history. And without dependence on this, I was already a patriot of Tashkent (as in the song from what beginning. on). Already in high school and at the university, an understanding came to Uzbekistan, the region, that everything is also a homeland and is one, but as happens in my youth, I taught the subject of history, out of necessity, but that impression of the history of our territories was the most gloomy - constant wars, first foreign invasions, and closer to the late Middle Ages, then just fratricidal strife. So, it was more interesting when the ancient and antique stories were passed. By the way, I'm not a historian by education. Interest in history came in adulthood. Probably reading the historical novels of European authors, patriotism leaped up and began to read our historical works. Somehow, they began to come to memory, once passing topics on the subject of history (from school, university), and especially on recent history and the stories of the Father. Of course, when he told me, in my youth, I listened to the floor, but when I was already interested, he was already elderly and suddenly died (someone, in my show, said: when I was young, my father seemed to me an eccentric, but when I turned 30, it turned out that he suddenly grew wiser. :)), and last years I read a certain amount of printed text on our history, which surprisingly rediscovered what I had once heard, read, in a new sense, or, shall we say, I had already begun to realize the meaning of what I had learned. But I remained a patriot of my land, considered it important to gain sovereignty, and remained conservative in my values. But the main vision of the formation of modern Uzbekistan has changed in a new light.
You say that it is important that we are Turks, that they have always been on the territory of Wed. Asia, Turan, but according to the Gumilev Türks are already mestizo (Mongo-Aryan) in origin, and this took place on the territory of the modern region of eastern Turkestan and northern China. There have always been Turkic tribes with a predominance of one type or another. That the Aryan nomadic tribes (described in the Avesta) lived throughout the steppe zone of Eurasia (50 degrees north latitude) from the Danube and the Black Sea coast of Europe, the Caspian coast, the Volga steppes, the Dashti-Kipchaks steppes, the eastern Turk-n, and the steppes of sowing ... China was originally inhabited by nomadic Aryan tribes (the largest unification squares are the Scythians, Sarmatians, Saki, Tochars, etc.) They all ate horse meat, all the nomads of the tribe were modern warriors, fighting a battle only with cavalry using tactics similar to those of the Turks. Mongolian, dwelling in prefabricated yurts. Only the language was East Iranian. And so, at the junction of the habitation of the Aryan nomads and the Mongoloids of the north of the modern. China has begun mestizization. Proto-Türkic, then Türkic languages \u200b\u200bappeared. The first Cossacks appeared (bandit hordes formed by renegades of different tribes.). And these predatory hordes became the dominant horde in the steppe and plunged the tribes into vasal dependence, and as a result forced them to participate in their campaigns. The opinion of many Türkologists agrees that the mentality of a Turk consists of respect for strength and spirit, to the detriment of other qualities of a person, and they willingly submit to the despotic power of one of them, whose latent dream (or ideal) is to take his place someday, and when the very first slack on the part of the leader or the appearance of an alternative to him, they betray him. Yes, they survived in the harsh natural conditions of the whims of a ragged nature and life, having perfectly adapted to it over the centuries, but unlike sedentary cultures, they remained uncouth, in the elements of sedentary civilizations they did not immediately get along with it, but eventually subjugated to the culture they had conquered.
As I said, the Turks of different epochs and regions differ in appearance, especially those who were swarfed at a later time (compare the modern Turks and Azeris, although they are both descendants of the Oguzes, they mixed with the types in the conquered territories.). Based on this, I can say that the early Turks of our territory are not even quite Uzbeks. Ak Orda Uzbek tribes are motley in composition, all the same are Turkic tribes (before the Chingiz, - but you must admit that there is a certain proportion of Mongoloid genes in the Turks, for example, in the Khitan there is a lot of genes) and plus purely Mongolian (Chingiz: Tatars, Naimans, etc.) Mongoloids gave modern Kazakhs, as it follows, real Uzbeks are the same Kazakhs.
Our early Turks, somewhere completely, and somewhere partially switched to a sedentary and agricultural culture, and adopted local customs and cults, Zoroastrianism, Christianity, Buddhism. And their language differs dialectally from the language of nomadic Uzbeks. Moreover, they mixed with the local Sogdian Europoids. (For example, the Turks have become more similar to Europeans and the Azeris to Iranians, even the emirs of the Mankyt dynasty, from the word flat-nosed, having children from local Tajik women, they themselves became similar to them). Arabs come, but do not leave, they assimilate, bringing in a new cultural and mental moment - they are introducing Islam. (By the way, the ethnonym Tajik appears in Central Asia precisely at this time. Having first Islamized Ajam Iran, Muslims Iranians were already carrying out missionary activities on an equal footing with the Arabs in the territories that were at times vassal. Tajiks were associated with the locals with the Muslim Iranian, and then with everyone who spoke in Parsi.). Then the state, where Muslim nomadic Turkic dynasties dominate, the sedentary people lead the same way and way of life and it seems that genetically does not change very much. And then the invasion of Chingiz, the division of the conquered territories between the sons. The lot of jumi and chagataya neighbors. Mongols in the Juchi ulus are mestized in the Dashti-Kipchak with the Kipchaks and others. Turks, who also have Mongoloid genes. Some are more and some are less. Therefore, the tribes of nomadic Uzbeks in the overwhelming majority were obvious Mongoloids, but they had already Turkized the Mongols themselves, in language, but not quite in culture and mentality. In the same Bulgaria, on the basis of which the Kazan Khanate was based, the type is somewhat different, Tatars + Bulgars. In the Chagatai ulus, the division into Maverannahr with a Muslim and sedentary mentality immediately went, where the Chagatai Mongol tribes were Turkified by local Turks with their dialect and appearance and the Muslim mentality, and in Mogolistan they remained purely Mongolian - language, culture, way of life and mentality. And now the Sheibanid Uzbeks invade Maverannahr. In Mogolistan, the Oirats will attack the Kazakhs, and then mix with them. Mogolistan is inhabited by early Uyghurs, who are descendants of the ancient Uyghur tribes, who then, somewhere completely, and somewhere partially settle down, assimilating local Sogdians, or Turfans (by the way, in modern China, who remained in hard-to-reach mountain areas, although they are called Chinese Tajiks their language differs from the language of other Tajiks) and on the basis of their writing they create the Old Uigur script. Modern Uighurs have assimilated those Oirats plus the Kirghiz. That is why it is possible to compare modern "Uzbeks" with Uighurs, in that they are very similar both in culture and language and in appearance (although only the ancient sedentary types of inhabitants of oases and other sides) but in no way with real Uzbek nomads from Akorda ... By the way, modern representatives of nomadic Uzbeks, who have preserved their identity in the countryside, are very similar to modern Kazakhs both in dilekt, and anthropologically and culturally and mentally and household items. The names of the tribes and the clans of their constituents are also similar.

Now back to modern history father, and even our writers of the beginning of the century aibek, kadyri and others. they said that the people of Tashkent had a very close relationship with the Kazakhs, traded with them either by visiting them or at seasonal fairs. Here the Kazakhs have always shown superiority over the sedentary inhabitants, always in military strength, but not in scholarship, literacy, craft and trade. They called them Sarts, but they recognized them as Uzbeks from Akorda, but not very Kurama. My father said that before the Kokand people, the Kazakhs officially ruled for some time, and from that time there is an imprint on the development and urban planning of Tashkent. Being a metropolis, by the standards of that time, Tashkent was in the late Middle Ages unprepossessing, but the center of trade. In short, paying off from the Kazakhs, the Tashkent people lived their Muslim life. There were many names derived from Parsi, textbooks in schools were in Farsi. The first textbook in maktab was a haftiak, also in Parsi. Educated people knew Farsi well, and traders knew Kazakh. My father said that my grandfather got along well with Kazakh biys. Maybe because we belonged to the Khoja, and the ancestor Ismail ata (buried in Turbat) whom we revered by the Kazakhs. The father describes the Kazakhs of that time as very simple-minded, trusting, but not always fulfilling their obligations. They are very welcoming. They saved my grandfather in the steppe from a snowstorm. If they had not saved, then there would not have been me. If a Kazakh is stubborn, then it is difficult to convince him, there were outbursts of sudden aggression, that is, from a calm, relaxed state. A completely different demeanor of urban residents, they can talk and persuade, are very skillful in persuasion, prudent (life represents meager means and opportunities) and zealous, very religious (of course, compared to Kazakhs :)).
Father said that the Dzungars attacked the Kazakhs who ruled Tashkent, that after that, they left the Syr Darya steppes on the left bank, and Tashkent was, logically, passed to China, because the Chinese defeated the Dzungars, but did not come to Tashkent, which caused a struggle between the khokims of the 4th Daha, Yunus Khoja defeated, and became the ruler of independent Tashkent, and conquered the surrounding lands, then the Kokand khan came.
Then the Russians came and besieged Tashkent for 40 days. The Bukhara Emir did not help, but went to conquer the Kokand, taking advantage of the moment. When the revolution took place, the Muslim intelligentsia and the clergy made up their own public leadership, but the Bolsheviks outplayed them and created a government of working Muslims and working Russians and other nat. Russia (which prevailed. Generally public opinion the townspeople were ruled by the eshans (sheikhs of the Sufi schools), In the defense of Tashkent from the tsarist troops, at their calls, ordinary people (when the sarbaz already could not do anything, and the actual ruler of the Kokand khanate (toli kipchak, toli kirghiz) hudoerkhan's father-in-law was already defeated outside the city walls ) rushed with clubs and bare fists on bayonets and under the hail of buckshot. It was only the senselessness of resistance that made the call of the sheikhs to resist, and the elders of the city surrendered it.
Here there is a difference in mentality between the settled and nomads, which I myself have already observed among the representatives of our inhabitants of the steppe zones with obvious traditions from the Kazakh people (jockey, yurts, Mongoloidness, although our type is recognizable from Kazakh, more Mongolism or metism with Europoid characteristics, and Kazakhs, I don’t know how, but they differ from ours, but the Kazakhs are sometimes very similar to the kishlak Uzbeks.
Yes, the Turks were long ago on Wed. Asia, but they are not the same person, even in Babur Nam it is said who is Turkic, who is Mongol (Babur himself is a Turkic Mongolian barlas + the blood of the Sart wives of his ancestors + a real Chingizid Mongol by his mother) who is Sart with the Turkic language, who is Sart with Farsi, who Tajik, who is Tukrmen, who is Karluk, etc., even by the tribe). Even according to the description of their Timurids, it can be traced that many of them are explicit Mongoloids. The Temurids themselves fought with the Uzbeks, and sometimes the Sheibani of the Khan Babur is simply called Uzbek. But Emir Temur called his state only "Mulki Turon", and not Uzbekistan. So that's where the Uzbeks have always been. Just read even textbooks with a different attitude, and you yourself will see the contradictions in the ethnogenesis of a modern Uzbek. The Republic of Uzbekistan is more than 80 years old, but Bogdast it will exist for another 500 and 1000 years, because the basis for the Bolsheviks for the establishment of the prevailing Uzbek nation in cf. Asia served, the Sheibanid dynasties existed until the 20th century for about 400 years.

27. Svetlana (Oidyn) Norbaeva (born in 1944 in Tashkent) - theater and film actress, People's Artist of the Uzbek SSR. Svetlana Norbaeva is the mother of the famous director and producer Janik Fayziev.

26. Uzbek actress Rano Shodieva

25. Uzbek singer Diera

24. Uzbek singer and actress Sevinch Muminova

23. Singer Laylo Galieva

22. Matlyuba Alimova (born 12 August 1954) - Soviet and russian actress, known for the films "Little Tragedies" (1979), "Gypsy" (1979), "Vasily Buslaev" (1982), "The Tale of the Star Boy" (1983), "Return of Budulai" (1985). Matlyuba Alimova is an Uzbek by her father.

21. Uzbek singer Munisa Rizaeva

20.Uzbek actress Asal Shodieva

18. Tamara Shakirova (November 26, 1955 - February 22, 2012) - actress, Honored Artist of the Uzbek SSR. Tamara Shakirova (married to Ganieva) is the mother of the modern Uzbek singer Raikhon Ganieva, who is also represented in this rating.

17. Uzbek singer Zamzama

16. Muborak Zhamolkhonova (Ashurboeva) (born August 5, 1986) is an actress and singer, a member of the Shakhrizoda group.

14. Actress Parizoda Shermatova

13. Farid's model

12. Zilola Nuralieva (born December 24, 1986) is a model working in China and Japan under the pseudonym “Lola”. Height - 179 centimeters, figure parameters: 84-61-90.

10. Lola Yuldasheva (born September 4, 1985), better known as “Lola”, is an Uzbek singer and actress.

5. Zarina Nizomiddinova is an Uzbek actress.

4. Kamilla Mukhlisova (born September 26, 1984 in Tashkent) - actress, model. Height - 163 centimeters, figure parameters: 83-57-84.

3. Irina Sharipova (born on February 7, 1992) - “Miss Tatarstan-2010”, the first vice-miss of the “Russia-2010” competition, the representative of Russia at international competition beauty "Miss World 2010". Irina Sharipova's height is 178 centimeters, body measurements: 83-60-87. Irina Sharipova is an Uzbek on her father's side, and on her mother's side Irina has Uzbek, Tatar, Russian and Ukrainian roots.

2. Zilola Musaeva (born on July 28, 1979), better known under the pseudonym “Shahzoda”, is an Uzbek singer and actress.

1. Raykhon Ganieva (born September 16, 1978) is an Uzbek actress and singer. Raykhon is the daughter of the famous actress Tamara Shakirova.

The Uzbeks are a Turkic-speaking people of approximately 28 million people. In the USSR, Uzbeks were the third largest nation (after Russians and Ukrainians). Currently, about 23 million Uzbeks live in Uzbekistan (81.7 percent of the republic's population), about 2.7 million - in Afghanistan, more than 900 thousand - in Tajikistan and about 800 thousand - in Kyrgyzstan. Also, a significant Uzbek diaspora exists in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Russia and other countries. The Uzbeks (like the Tajiks) are Caucasians, belong to the Pamir-Fergana race. The Uzbeks of North Khorezm have an admixture of Mongoloid elements.

Below are the 28 most beautiful famous Uzbek women. The top is based on the results of a vote that took place on the Top-antropos.com website for four months.

28th place: Iroda Nosirova - singer.

27th place: Svetlana (Oidyn) Norbaeva (born in 1944 in Tashkent) - theater and film actress, People's Artist of the Uzbek SSR. Svetlana Norbaeva is the mother of the famous director and producer Janik Fayziev.

26th place: Early Shodieva - Uzbek actress.

25th place: Diera - Uzbek singer .

24th place: Sevinch Muminova- Uzbek singer and actress.

23rd place: Laylo Galieva- singer.

22nd place: Matlyuba Alimova (born August 12, 1954) - Soviet and Russian actress, known for the films "Little Tragedies" (1979), "Gypsy" (1979), "Vasily Buslaev" (1982), "The Tale of the Star Boy" (1983), " Return of Budulai "(1985). Matlyuba Alimova is an Uzbek by her father.

21st place: Munisa Rizaeva- Uzbek singer.

20th place: Asal Shodieva - Uzbek actress.

18th place: Tamara Shakirova (November 26, 1955 - February 22, 2012) - actress, Honored Artist of the Uzbek SSR. Tamara Shakirova (married to Ganieva) is the mother of the modern Uzbek singer Raikhon Ganieva, who is also represented in this rating.

17th place: Zamzama- Uzbek singer.

16th place: Muborak Zhamolkhonova (Ashurboeva) (born on August 5, 1986) - actress and singer, member of the "Shakhrizoda" group.

14th place: Parizoda Shermatova- actress.

13th place: Farida- model.

12th place: Zilola Nuralieva (born December 24, 1986) is a model working in China and Japan under the pseudonym "Lola". Height - 179 centimeters, figure parameters: 84-61-90.

10th place: Lola Yuldasheva (born September 4, 1985), better known as "Lola", is an Uzbek singer and actress.

9th place: Ravshana Kurkova (born August 22, 1980 in Tashkent) - Russian actress.

8th place: Dilnoza Kubaeva (born November 22, 1986 in Tashkent) - Uzbek actress.

5th place: Zarina Nizomiddinova - Uzbek actress.

4th place: Kamilla Mukhlisova (born September 26, 1984 in Tashkent) - actress, model. Height - 163 centimeters, figure parameters: 83-57-84.

3rd place: Irina Sharipova (born on February 7, 1992) - "Miss Tatarstan-2010", first vice-miss of the contest "Russia-2010", a representative of Russia at the international beauty contest "Miss World-2010". Irina Sharipova's height is 178 centimeters, body measurements: 83-60-87. Irina Sharipova is an Uzbek on her father's side, and on her mother's side Irina has Uzbek, Tatar, Russian and Ukrainian roots.

2nd place: Zilola Musaeva (born on July 28, 1979), better known under the pseudonym "Shahzoda", is an Uzbek singer and actress.

1st place: Raykhon Ganieva (born September 16, 1978) is an Uzbek actress and singer. Raykhon is the daughter of the famous actress Tamara Shakirova.