Genre of the work of the official of the official. "Death of the official", analysis of the story of Chekhov, an essay. New phase of conflict

The story of A. P. Chekhov "Death of the official" is one of the early works of the writer, in 1886, in 1886, the "motley stories" collection. It was written in the spirit of artistic realism. This direction in the literature in Russia was developed in the second half of the XIX century. At the end of the work, the writer goes beyond his framework, since he considered missing over death unacceptable.

Chekhov, "Death of the Official": summary, analysis

The theme of the "small" person is an official who is often without any reasons is in constant uncertainty and confusion, delivered here to the fore. This is how the author protests against any personality suppression. Summary Chekhov's story "Death of the Officer" very brightly displays all the consequences of such an appeal.

Heroes

Only three characters are present in the story. This is an official of the low rank of worm workers Ivan Dmitrievich, his wife and general of the brisks. The main attention of the work is aimed at the official who became the object of ridicule. But the nature of the rest of the characters leaves the uncooked A. P. Chekhov. "The death of the official" (summary) describes the worm, a small, pathetic and comic man. The genuine laughter causes his stupid and ridiculous perseverance, and his humiliation generates pity. In his persistent apologies, in front of the general, he passes all the borders and reverses his human dignity.

Contrast

After analyzing the topic "Chekhov," Death of the Officer ": a summary, analysis," it should be noted that the author in the plot opposes two personalities. This is the boss and subordinate.

It is from the conflict that A. P. Chekhov "Death of the official" begins. Summary shows its traditional development: General of the Breezers eventually shouted on the subordinate, because of this worms dies from the head of the heart. It would seem that the usual scheme for the plot. However, there is a presence of some innovative techniques in the work, because the general has reached the subordinate after that he himself brought him his annoying apologies.

Comic and somewhat unexpected reversal of events lies in the worldview of the worker official who died not at all because of fear, and from the fact that the general, as a man of high rank, violated his "Holy Principles".

Chekhov did not change their style, his laconic is striking. In his works, a deep meaning is always lighted, to know which is possible only through artistic details.

Summary of the story "Death of the official", Chekhov

Now, in fact, you can proceed to the very plot of the work. Ivan Dmitrievich worms, who serves the responsibilities of the institution, sits in the second row, looks into binoculars and enjoys the operetta French composer of Plankett "Kornville Bells". Then his face wrinkled, her eyes rolled down, breathing smotes, he bent and sneezed. Worms was a man very polite, he lasted as a handkerchief and looked around, whether he was placed by his Chishan. And suddenly discovered that the old man was sitting in front, wipes the bald with a handkerchief and murms something. Looking at the most careful, Ivan Dmitrievich saw that this was no one else like Stat General Bryzlov. From this it becomes bad. He awkwardly pulled him to him and began to whisper on the ear of an apology.

Trifles

Continuing Chekhov "Death of the official" (the summary of the work we present in the review) by the fact that the general replied that, in general, nothing terrible happened. But he continued to apologize and then apologize, then the general asked him to quietly listen to operetta. But the official did not lose everything and even went to the general to the general and began to ask for forgiveness, for which he answered that he had long forgot about it.

But now the worm seemed that General was keen and, probably, thought he wanted to spit in him. The official came home and told his wife about what had happened, she was frightened and said that her husband was too frivolous to this, which should be taken to the general and once again ask for forgiveness.

The next day, surrounding the new uniform, he goes to General. Which turned out to be a lot of visitors in the reception. Interviewing several visitors, the general saw Chervyakov, who began again with his ridiculous apologies because of yesterday's. Brizvalov answered adequately: "Yes, full! What trifles! "

Apologies

But worms did not stop everything and suggested even write an explanatory letter. And then the general could not stand and cooked at him, considering that he just mocks him. However, worms mumbled in bewilderment that he was not at all laughter.

In general, coming home, he thought and decided to go to the general again tomorrow. The next day, the brisks were simply not able to stand it and shouted on him: "I went out!"

This is how the Chekhov "Death of the official" completes. A brief content in the end tells about the fact that the worm has become bad, he backed up to the door and mechanically shoved home. Returning to the apartment, he went straight in Vitzmundire on the sofa and died.

"Death of the official" is one of the early stories of the famous Russian writer Anton Chekhov. In 1886, the work entered the collection "Mottle stories". "Death of the official" is written in the spirit realismThis direction has spread to Russia in the second half of the XIX - XX century.

Chekhov managed to combine "strict realism" with increased conventionality. At the beginning of the story, we can clearly trace the features of this direction, but at the end of the works of Chekhov goes beyond the framework of realism, for whom the mockery of death is unacceptable.

In this work, Chekhov raises the theme of a "small" person. In his works of Chekhov, trying to protest the suppression of the human person, and in the work of the "death of the official" shows the consequences of such an appeal vividly: the subject of ridicule is a small official who is in constant confusion without much reasons.

There are only three characters in the story: an official with the speaking surname Ivan Dmitrievich worms, the wife of Chervyakov and general of the brisks. The most attention of Chekhov pays to the official, because it the main character, mockery object. The remaining characters of the author are not interested.

Little man in this story and comic, and miserable. Laughter causes a ridiculous insistance of worm, and pity gives rise to his zealous humiliation. Once again, apologizing to the general, the official renounced his human dignity.

At the beginning of the story, the author compares two sides: a small official and general. From this moment on, the conflict is generated, traditional for Chekhov's works. Due to the fact that the general shouted to the visitor, the worms dies - it seems to be the usual scheme of the plot. But there are significant shifts in the story: the general shouted on the subordinate only when the latter brought him to aggression.

Such an unexpected and comic turn of events is precisely in a particular worldview of the main character. And the worms died not at all of the fright, but from the fact that the saints for him the principles broke a high-rank person.

Master of the Small Genre and this time could not change his style. Chekhov laconicity is simply amazing. In his small works, a deep meaning is often laid, and it is possible to know it only thanks to artistic details that are called upon to convey the reader the basic idea. This story does not feel the presence of the author, Chekhov is removed from the heroes. This technique helps to describe the actions even more objectively.

• Analysis of the story of A.P. Chekhov "Ionch"
• How do you understand the term "case man"?
• "Beloloby", analyzing the story of Chekhov
• Grisha, analyzing the story of Chekhov
• "Mountain", analyzing the story of Chekhov

In 1883, the story of an unforgettable writer Anton Pavlovich Chekhov was published in the famous magazine under the name of the "fragments" - "Death of the official", which made a proper impression on readers. The work was released under the pseudonym A. Stehonte.

It's amazing that the plot of Chekhov suggested his comrade Anton Begichev, thanks to which the writer managed to write a striking story, touched to the depths of the soul.

The work has its own genre: "Scene", where a major hero is a kind of official, whose name is Ivan worms, which accidentally sprayed General Bizvalov, sneezing in his direction. The hero after all that happened to torments himself for the deed, can not find a place to calm down, he constantly apologizes to the general in the hope that he is so much and forgive, but there is no case before. Chervikhakova forgot him long ago, and he suffers in the soul, is not in his plate. As a result, Anton Pavlovich in his story raises an important problem: "Little Man" in front of society.

Chekhov explicitly shows readers that it protests against the person to lose his dignity, suppressed a person in himself. This is not acceptable for the writer. And worms just such a hero, which his ridiculous perseverance kills himself. He causes both laughter and pity. Every time, apologizing to the brisk, the character only does that he lowers his level. And what? Ivan worms dies in the final of the work not because of the frightened when the general shouted, who had nerves, no, he died from a violation by the general principles of the hero. This is a very tragic work that makes you think about your life and make the necessary lessons.

The story is filled with many important detailsWhat plays your role. In the center of the work unusual case, not a character or idea. As a result, Chekhov depicts one or another circumstance, thanks to which the character of the hero is revealed.

So, in the name of the story of Chekhov laid a deep problem: the opposition of man and rank. There are many questions after reading the work, because it is Anton Pavlovich, which amazes with its talent: Mysterious Scripture of stories, short in its volume. The main theme of the work is undoubtedly the inner world of man. This writer pays very particular importance. Chekhov - Master of his case. Its brevity is unusual, unpredictable. So his stories are relevant and popular not only among the older generation, but also the young. Therefore, it is necessary to turn to the work of the writer, in order to understand the life itself, and its laws.

More details

Characters

The main hero is worms. His surname is talking, shows for its insignificance, on his miserable position. He works by an executor, that is, conducts various kinds of punishment for people, and is a small official. The same small as a worm.

The second character is an old man rolled. He general, respected person, occupies an honorable place in society.

Event Development

During the play in the theater of worms, he sneezed and sprayed the general sitting in front. Now he is trying to push the forgiveness, despite the fact that the rolled rolled people have tried to take it away from him: "Nothing, nothing ...", "Ah, fullness ... I have forgotten, and you are all about the same!".

Causes of worm's behavior

In this story, the slave essence of a person was clearly shown, who made himself a slave. He sought himself with chains. Worm need to humiliate, you need to bend and ask. He is completely incomprehensible simple words I slander, it seems to him that he must suffer, must endure, must suffer. Worm worry does not occur that forgiveness does not need to be poured. The general and official seem to speak in different languages, and it is partly true, because worms are a typical slave.

What makes him be so? Disappointment. People with slave psychology cannot live without anyone's patronage, as their happiness depends on other people. And this dependence, they come up with themselves, nobody holds them and does not make them behave.

Czech ratio

The reader may notice that despite the name of the story of the Death of the Official, Chekhov pays for the very death of only one word at the very end of the work. This author emphasizes the commerciality of what is happening. The worms are ridiculously behaving, trying to defend her, nothing worthwhile, position in society.

Promise and main thought

Chekhov wants to show that in no case should not behave in a similar way, and that it is necessary to make every effort to get rid of "slave psychology." You always need to have your opinion, soberly assess the situation and most importantly - to be able to hear and realize your mistakes.

Analysis 3.

The work in exaggerated form shows the morals of Russian officials of the time of the life of Chekhov. In the image of the main character, one of the timeless human deficiencies is also shown - a pleasing of a strong, mixed in cowardice.

The worm's executor (middle officer) in the theater accidentally sneezed on Statsky General Brizvalov. This incident caused horror from the lower official. He began to apologize, preventing the general to watch the performance, then continued to do it in the lobby. After it was bored by this brisk in the service.

The author's satire is not aimed at criticizing the Russian autocracy, orders who give up the superior power over those who found themselves below. Chekhov shows the Stat General with the usual sane, polite and even patient man. He from the very beginning forgiven and was ready to forget this small incident. Brizvalov in a sharp shape kicked out annoying slave-eyed only after he really brought him out of himself, like any other person who does not possess angelic humility.

In addition, it is emphasized that Stat General was not the immediate head of worm, as it was even served in another department. This moment is also masterfully used by the author in the episode, when Chervyakov's wife, first also frightened his spouse heavily for his career, learning about this fact, calm down. Here is the show of another type of chinovation. Chekhov reminds readers that there may be quite sensible people.

It is also indicative that the main character does not represent in the details of the consequences of what happened. It does not begin to analyze, does not begin to search for workarounds, possible other service sites, if it still comes to dismissal. Worms, seeing the failure of his attempts to get forgiveness (although the general said it about it) wants to write a letter, but again it does not even make such a simple step.

His fear is irrational. He is afraid of bosses not only because he had to work with people who have power over him. In the end, the army, and the public service, and even business are always built on a hierarchical principle. However, not all people who have found themselves in these areas become cowardly holsters.

The cause of the death of the official coming from strong experiences after he was immaculated by the Stat General, his own spiritual qualities became. His natural cowardice found a nutrient medium in the orders of the Russian bureaucracy.

Several interesting writings

• Samson tragedy Vyrina - an essay for grade 7

  Samson Vyrin - the protagonist of the story of A.S. Pushkin "Stationander". His social status is due to the lowest rank in the table of ranks. By a storytellor, he seems to reader as a small person with an unhappy destiny.

• Analysis of the story of Bunin Mr. from San Francisco Essay grade 11

  This work Bunin wrote in four days. Almost all events are fictional. The whole story fills the philosophical reflections, the author argues over the meaning of existence

• Writing in the picture Savrasova Winter 3 class Description

  The picture "Winter" stands out from all the creative works of the author. A narrow trail divided the cloth into two parts. On the left - our attention opens a dense forest and a couple of trees at the roadside. On the right there are only two lifeless birch.

• Pushkin Lyceist 6th grade message Overall
• Analysis of the story Korolenko Children of the Dungeon

  This story V. G. Korolenko began writing being concluded. Returning to Petersburg, he graduated from writing it. Many can be arguing about this story taken from the life of the writer.

History of creation

"... In Russian literature, the amazing mind flashed and disappeared, because after all, only very smart people, those who, the mind" overflow, can only say good joke, the good joke can only say. . Bunin. L.N. Tolstoy spoke about him: "Chekhov is Pushkin in prose." Under these words, the strongest artistic impression was meant, which he left Chekhov prose, who was surprised by his brevity and simplicity.

According to the memoirs of Chekhov, the story of the story "Death of the official" told Anton Pavlovich Begichev. He was simple: some kind of man, carelessly referred to the theater, the next day came to an unfamiliar man and began to apologize for causing him anxiety in the theater. Funny anecdotal case.

"The death of the official" refers to the so-called early stories of the writer. Published in 1883 with the subtitle - "case". "The death of the official", like other stories of the writer, included by the author in the collection of 1886 "Mottle stories". All these works reveal the topic of a small man.

Rod, genre, creative method

Before coming to Russian literature A.P. Chekhov was believed that a small epic form was a "fragment" of a large (romance) form: "Chapter, eliminated from the novel," said V.G. Belinsky about the story. The differences between the novel and the story (so called the story) were determined only by the number of pages. Chekhov, according to L.h. Tolstoy, "created new, completely new ... For the whole world, the form of Scripture ...".

The story "Death of the official" was written in the genre of "scenes". This is a short humorous story, a picture from nature, whose community consists in the transfer of the conversation of characters. Chekhov raised the scene to the level of large literature. The main thing in the scene is the speech of the characters, plausible and consumer and funny at the same time. An important role is played by the title and speaking names of the characters.

Thus, the problem of the story "Death of the official" is announced in the title itself, which represents the combination of opposite concepts. An official is an official, in a uniform, fastened to all buttons (this applies to his feelings); He, as it were, deprived of the living movements of the soul, and suddenly - death, although sad, but still a purely human property, that an official, such an idea about him is contraindicated. The work of Chekhov, it can be assumed in advance, is a story not about the disappearance of human individuality, but about the cessation of the functioning of the official, a certain soulless mechanism. In the story, there is not so many people as his outer shell.

The story is generally written in the framework of critical realism. However, in the second half of the story, the behavior of Cherkivakov passes the limits of household likelihood: too, it is a cowardly, too annoying, it does not happen in life. In the end of the Czechs is completely cut, open. This "died" he takes a story beyond household realism. Therefore, this story is felt as quite humorous: death is perceived as non-seriousness, conventionity, exposure of admission, move. The writer laughs, plays, the word "death" itself does not take seriously. In the collision of laughter and death triumphs laughter. It determines the overall tonality of the work. So funny Chekhov goes into the accusatory.

Topic

Rethinking the traditional theme of a "little man", coming from Pushkin, Gogol, Turgenev and Early Dostoevsky, Chekhov at the same time continues and develops in the new conditions the humanistic pathos of this direction. Like the "stationander" Pushkin, Schinel, Gogol, "Poor People" Dostoevsky, Chekhov's works are performed by protest against the suppression and distortion of the human person, in new historical conditions even more merciless and sophisticated. At the same time, in the story, the subject of ridiculous is a small official, which is depicted and reptiles when no one forces him.

Idea

Chekhov usually in the center of the story is not a character and not an idea, but the situation is an unusual case, anecdote. Moreover, the case is not accidental - it highlights certain patterns of life, the essence of character. Chekhov had a brilliant gift to notice such situations in reality in which the characters would have revealed not just with the maximum, but with an exhaustive fullness and as socio-ethical types, and as people with psychology characteristic only by him, manner behavior.

In the story "Death of the official", the writer showed how a small official of worms, being in a humiliated position, not only does not seek to get out of it, but himself proclaims slave behavior. As it became the subject of ridiculous in the story. Chekhov told for high moral ideals.

Basic heroes

The story has two main characters. One of them is a general who plays a minor role and only reacts to the actions of the hero. The general is deprived of the name and patronymic, and this is natural, because we see it through the eyes of Chervikov, but he sees only the uniform (this word is often repeated in the text) of an important person. About the general We will not know anything substantive, but it is obvious that he, too, in violation of the tradition, a little bit of "humiliated and offended" worm. One thing is clear: the characters of the story speak in different languages, they have various logic and understanding - the dialogue between them is impossible.

The second character is the worm official - the object of mockery in the story. Traditionally, in Russian literature, it was a "small", poor, "humiliated and offended" man causing sympathy from the reader. Chekhov, with his indestructible feeling of freedom, sought to overcome this stamp. He wrote Brother Alexander in 1885 (after the creation of the story "Death of the official") about "small" people: "Throw you, make mercy, your oppressed college registrars! Do you really do not feel silently that this topic has already been tangled and caught up with sowing? And where are you there in Asia do you find those flour, who are experiencing in your stories of nonsense? Truly you tell you, even reading terribly! It is more realistic now to depict the college registrars that do not give their excelice to live. " Little man worms here and ridiculous, and pity at the same time: it is ridiculous with his ridiculous perseverance, pity because he degrades himself, renounced from his own human personality, human dignity.

Plot and composition

In the story of Chekhov, one of the participants in the events turns out to be a small official, the other - General. The surname of the official - worms - speaks for itself, emphasizing the gentlement of the Executor1 Ivan Dmitrievich. This initial situation creates a traditional conflict. Garked general on a small, defenseless, dependent person - and killed him. Chekhov, General really shouted on the official, as a result of which: "In the abdomen of worm, something broke away. Not seeing nothing, I don't hear anything, he backed up to the door, went out into the street and shoved ... Calling mechanically home, without removing the Vitzmundra, he lay down on the sofa and ... died. "

Thus, it appears as if the usual storyline. However, there are substantial shifts. Start by the fact that the general snapped on his visitor only when he brought him all new and new visits, all new and new explanations, and all on the same topic, to complete exhaustion, and then to the allocation.

It does not look like a pitiful, dependent face and official. After all, he documeks his apologies to General because he depends on him. Not at all. He apologizes, so to speak, on fundamental considerations, believing that respect for persons is the sacred basis of public existence, and it is deeply discouraged by the fact that it is not accepted. When the general once again dismissed him, noticing: "Yes, you just laugh, milostisar! .." - worms did not get angry for a joke. "What are there mockery? - thought worms. - There is no ridicule at all! General, and can not understand! " Thus, worms are radically different from previous literary fellow. In the worldview worm and is an unexpected, comic turn of a traditional theme and a storyline. It turns out that worms dies at all of the fright. The drama of man is that he did not bring the principles for him for him, and not anyone else, but a silent face, General. This will not make worms. So the harmless joke develops under the pen of Chekhov to satire on the dominant morals and customs.

Artistic peculiarity

In the history of Russian literature A.P. Chekhov entered as a master of a small genre. With the name of the writer, the formation of a satirical story, which determine the features of which were laconicism and aphoristicity.

In the title "Death of the Official", the main thought of the work is laid: the opposition of the rank and man, the unity of comic and tragic. The content of the story produces a strong artistic impression due to brevity and simplicity. It is known that Chekhov adhered to thoughts: "write talented - that is, short." The small volume of the work, its fictional laconicity determine the special dynamism of the story. This particular dynamic consists of verbs and their forms. It is through the verdal vocabulary that the plot is being developed, and the characteristics of heroes is given; Although, of course, the writer also applies other artistic techniques.

In the story of the characters talking surnames: worms and brys. Worry official serves as an executor. The meaning of this word is mentioned above. The second value of this word (it is marked in the dictionaries as outdated) is the following: Executor - the one who produced an execution, that is, punishment or led them. Today, this value is perceived as the main, as the former (the junior official in the office) is already forgotten. The phrase extector of worms is also chosen on the principle of comic contrast characteristic of Chekhov: an executor (that is, that is punished) and suddenly "funny" surname ... worms.

According to the writer, the literary work "should not only give a thought, but also the sound, ... sound impression." In the story, it is in a literal sense, "But suddenly his face frowned, his eyes got down, his breath stopped ... He took the binoculars from his eyes, bent and ... APCHE !!! He sneezed, as you can see "- causes a comic effect.

In a small story, there are no lengthy descriptions, internal monologues, therefore it appears on the fore artistic detail. It is the details that are carrying a huge semantic load in Chekhov. Literally one phrase can say everything about a person. In the last phrase, the story "Death of the official" author gives almost an explanation to everything: the official, "coming mechanically home, without removing the Vitzmundra, he lay down on the sofa and ... died." Vitzmundyr, this official uniform, as if an enrichness to it. Fear before the superior rank killed a man.

In the story "Death of the Officer", the author's position is clearly not expressed. It seems the impression of objectivity, indifference Chekhov to what is happening. The narrator does not appreciate the actions of the hero. He rises them, providing the reader with the opportunity to make his own conclusions.

The value of the work

Anton Pavlovich Chekhov is one of the greatest Russian-classic writers. He is known as a master of realistic story. The writer himself said this: "Artistic literature is because it is called artistic, which draws life such as it is in fact." The truth of life attracted it primarily. The main theme of Czech's creativity (as Tolstoy and Dostoevsky) was the inner world of man. But artistic methods, artistic techniques that were used in their work writers are different. Czechs are rightfully considered a master short story, novel miniatures. During the long years of work in the humorous journals of Chekhov, the skill of the narrator was finished, learned to a small amount to accommodate maximum content.

After the appearance of the story "Death of the Officer", many critics said that Chekhov wrote some absurd history that had no relation to life. The situation is indeed brought by the writer to the absurd, but it is precisely this that allows you to better see the absurdity of the life itself, which reigns low-planness, kindness, the deification of the bosses and the panic fear of him. According to the testimony of M.P. Chekhov, Brother writer, in the Bolshoi Theater there was a valid case close to the described, however it was unclear whether he was known to Chekhov. Other is known: in January 1882, Chekhov received a letter from his Taganrog familiar A.V. Petrova, which said: "On the eve of Christmas ... Our postmaster (the most famous monster and pedant) threatened one official (the older sorter K.D. Shchetinsky) to give it under the court, seems to be a violation of discipline, in a word, for personal insult; And then after an attempt to ask for forgiveness, after an attempt to ask for forgiveness, he left the office yes in the city garden ... a few hours before the uterus and hanged himself ... ". In other words, Chekhov managed to recreate a typical, albeit an absurd situation.

"Russian critics wrote that neither the style of Chekhov nor the choice of words, not all other testifies to the special writing care, which was obsessed with Gogol, Flaubert or Henry James. The dictionary of his poor, combinations of words banal; Juicy verb, a greenhouse adjective, a minting epithet made on a silver tray - all this is alien to him. He was not verbal virtuoso like Gogol; His muse was dressed on everyday dress. Therefore, Chekhov to give good as an example of the fact that it is possible to be an impeccable artist and without exceptional shine of verbal technique, without exceptional care about the elegant clauses of proposals. When Turgenev is accepted to talk about the landscape, it can be seen how he is concerned about the smoothness of the trouser folds of his phrase; I dropped my leg, he glances at the color of the socks. Chekhov is indifferent - not because these parts do not matter, for the writers of a certain warehouse they are natural and very important - but Chekhov is still because he was alien to all verbal ingenuity. Even a light grammatical irregularity or newspaper stamp was completely not disturbed. The magic of his art is that, despite the tolerance of misses, which would be easily avoided by a brilliant newcomer, despite the willingness to be content with the first oncoming word, Chekhov could convey the feeling of beauty, completely inaccessible to many writers who were considered that it was known for certain that Such a luxurious, lush prose. He seeks this, highlighting all the words the same dim dim light, giving them the same gray shade - the average between "the color of the dilapidated hedge and hanging clouds. A variety of intonations, flickering of the adorable irony, truly artistic stability of the characteristics, the colorfulness of the details, the fooling of human life - all this is purely Chekhov The features poured and overtakes the Radia-blurry verbal Maorevo "(V.V. Nabokov).

• Category: Analysis of the poem, works

Topic

Rethinking the traditional theme of a "little man", coming from Pushkin, Gogol, Turgenev and Early Dostoevsky, Chekhov at the same time continues and develops in the new conditions the humanistic pathos of this direction. Like the "stationander" Pushkin, Schinel, Gogol, "Poor People" Dostoevsky, Chekhov's works are performed by protest against the suppression and distortion of the human person, in new historical conditions even more merciless and sophisticated. At the same time, in the story of the subject of ridiculous, a small official is presented, which pies and reptiles when no one enters it.

Idea

Chekhov usually in the center of the story is not a character and not an idea, but the situation is an unusual case, anecdote. Moreover, the case is not accidental - it highlights certain patterns of life, the essence of character. Chekhov had a brilliant gift to notice such situations in reality in which the characters would have revealed not just with the maximum, but with an exhaustive fullness and as socio-ethical types, and as people with psychology characteristic only by him, manner behavior.

In the story "Death of the official", the writer showed how a small official of worms, being in a humiliated position, not only does not seek to get out of it, but himself proclaims slave behavior, which has become the subject of ridiculous in the story. Chekhov told for high moral ideals.

Basic heroes

The story has two main characters. One of them is a general who plays a minor role and only reacts to the actions of the hero. The general is deprived of the name and patronymic, and this is natural, because we see it through the eyes of Chervikov, but he sees only the uniform (this word is often repeated in the text) of an important person. About the general We will not know anything substantive, but it is obvious that he, too, in violation of the tradition, a little bit of "humiliated and offended" worm. One thing is clear: the characters of the story speak in different languages, they have various logic and understanding - the dialogue between them is impossible.

The second character is the worm official - the object of mockery in the story. Traditionally, in Russian literature, it was a "small", poor, "humiliated and offended" man causing sympathy from the reader. Chekhov, with his indestructible feeling of freedom, sought to overcome this stamp. He wrote Brother Alexander in 1885 (after the creation of the story "Death of the official") about "small" people: "Throw you, make mercy, your oppressed college registrars! Do you really do not feel silently that this topic has already been tangled and caught up with sowing? And where are you there in Asia in Asia find those flour that are worried about chinosh in your stories? Truly you tell you, even reading terribly! It is more realistic now to depict the college registrars that do not give their excelice to live. " Little man worms here and ridiculous, and pity at the same time: it is ridiculous with his ridiculous perseverance, pity because he degrades himself, renounced from his own human personality, human dignity.